From this section onwards you will be able to find more specialized data (and interactive figures) regarding the long-term analysis of the Bolivian energy system.
This section provides a detailed breakdown of energy consumption in Bolivia, modeled using a combination of bottom-up and top-down approaches. The energy demand model follows a hierarchical tree framework, as visualized in the sunburst chart, categorizing energy consumers into five levels: sector, subsector, class, usage type, and technology.
At the center of the diagram, total final energy demand for 2021 is represented at 81.7 TWh, branching into nine key sectors: Residential, Transport, Commercial, Public Lighting, Industry, Agriculture, Mining, Fishing & Others, and Non-Energy. Each sector is further divided into specific applications such as passenger transport, freight, industrial processes, heating, and other energy-intensive activities. These applications are connected to their respective energy carriers, including electricity, gasoline, diesel, fossil gas, LPG, LFO, lignocellulosic biomass (wood), and biowaste. The size of each segment reflects its share of energy consumption, with the transport and industrial sectors emerging as the largest consumers. Road transport is heavily dependent on gasoline and diesel, while industrial activities primarily rely on fossil gas and biomass for process heat. Meanwhile, residential energy demand is largely driven by cooking and electricity use.
1 Source publication of these results: Jimenez Zabalaga, P., Limpens, G., Thiran P., Villarroel-Schneider, J., Cardozo, E., & Jeanmart, H. (2025). "Towards a Sustainable Bolivian Energy System: The Pathway for Decarbonization under High Renewable Potential until 2050".
Model repository: https://github.com/CIE-UMSS/EnergyScope_Pathway_BO/tree/main/Characterization_and_projection_of_Bolivian_energy_demand
This chart illustrates Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by sector, where the stacked area plots represent emissions in MtCO₂, categorized by sector (e.g., transport, heating, electricity, and industry) over time.
This chart illustrates the changes in total installed capacities for the power system across years, measured in GW, categorized by type of generation technology.
This chart illustrates the changes in total energy production for the power system across years, measured in TWh, categorized by type of generation technology.
This chart illustrates the Hourly Electric Dispatch, measured in MW, simulated for an entire year in each decade. It presents the energy demand and generation by technology. The interactive chart allows users to explore the system's operational behavior for specific timeframes and technologies. From a general perspective, dispatch behavior shows that the electrical demand curve will be dramatically affected by the type of scenario, as in the BAU scenario, electric demand will keep its current shape, where peak demands are expected in the late afternoon. Alternatively, scenarios like the EPI or NZE will change the demand curve distribution as a result of new electrical demands that will be introduced in the system (from sectors and services like transport or low temperature heat demands are electrified). Finally, it can also be seen that, as the system increases its size and the shares of renewable technologies, the curtailment expected in the generation system will also increase, as flexible technologies such as gas turbines are decommissioned or limit their use due to emission restrictions.
This section provides an overview of energy flow dynamics across the three scenarios, with results shown every five years from 2021 to 2050. The Sankey diagram demonstrates how energy from key sources such as biomass, LPG, and fossil gas is allocated to sectors like transport, heating, and cooking. The width of each flow line is directly proportional to the amount of energy, allowing for a clear visualization of how energy consumption evolves over time as flows shift between different sources and uses.
2Source publication of these results: Fernandez Vazquez, C.A.A., Jimenez Zabalaga, P., Balderrama, S., Cardozo, E., Jeanmart, H. & Quoilin, S. (2024). "A bi-directional soft-linking method for a Whole Energy System Model and a Power System Optimization Model. Application and analysis for the Bolivian case". In: The European Climate and Energy Modelling Platform (ECEMP) 2024 conference.
Model repository: https://github.com/CIE-UMSS/EnergyScope_Pathway_BO
The following table summarizes the key parameters and technology assumptions across these scenarios:
| Category | Parameter | BAU | EPI | NZE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power generation | Installed capacity up to 2026 (GWelec.) |
Combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT): 1.492 | ||
| Open cycle gas turbine (OCGT): 1.051 | ||||
| Diesel genset: 0.114 | ||||
| Biomass grate fired steam turbine (GFST): 0.226 | ||||
| Syngas fired steam turbine (SGST): 0.001 | ||||
| Solar PV: 0.170 | ||||
| Wind onshore: 0.173 | ||||
| Hydro dam: 0.372 | ||||
| Hydro run-of-the-river (ROR): 0.364 | ||||
| Geothermal: 0.005 | ||||
| Installed capacity from 2026 |
Limited at their maximum value based on resource potential | |||
| Tech composition mix |
CCGT, OCGT, diesel genset, GFST, SGST, solar PV, wind onshore, hydro dam, hydro ROR, geothermal |
BAU scenario + Fuel cell, FBST BFBST, CFBST |
||
| Water heating |
Tech share in heat demand |
Share of solar thermal systems based on historical trends (500 new systems/year) |
Not limited | |
| Tech composition mix |
Electric heater, FG boiler, solar thermal systems | |||
| Lighting | Tech share in lighting demand |
Share of bulbs based on the National Efficient Lighting Project |
Not limited | |
| Tech composition mix |
Conventional bulb, LED bulb | |||
| Public lighting |
Tech share in public lighting demand |
Fixed share of lights over the years |
Goal defined in the NDC (6% LED light by 2030) |
Not limited |
| Tech composition mix |
Conventional light, LED light | |||
| Transport sector |
Tech share in transport demand |
Technology share based on historical trends |
BAU scenario + Goal defined in the NDC (10% electric public vehicles by 2030) |
Technology share based on historical trends |
| Tech composition mix |
Fossil fuel vehicles, electric car, electric tramway |
BAU scenario + electric bus |
EPI scenario + all types of electric vehicles, H2 vehicles |
|
| Bioenergy | Installed capacity | Fixed bioethanol production over the years |
Fixed maximum bioethanol and biodiesel production |
|
| Tech composition mix |
Bioethanol plant, biodiesel plant | BAU scenario + synthetic fuel plants |
||
| Mechanical energy |
Tech share in mechanical energy demand |
Fixed share of machinery over the years |
Not limited | |
| Tech composition mix |
Diesel machinery for all sectors, diesel tractors, electric machinery for commercial and industrial sector |
BAU scenario + electric machinery for all sectors + electric tractors |
||
| GHG emissions |
Emission limits | Not considered | Linear decrease until reaching net-zero emissions |
|